“Don’t mistake activity...

July 13, 2020

Share this article:

...for achievement.”



Just over 20 years ago, I wrote one of my many papers for my MBA on telecommuting. In it, I outlined my thoughts on how telecommuting would impact organizational leadership based on the world as we knew it then and with an eye towards the future. Given the societal lockdown due to the pandemic, I recently re-read what I wrote in late 1999 and was surprised at how the ideas still hold up as relevant in an era where we now refer to it as working from home, mobile workforce or anything but telecommuting!


The pandemic added social distancing as a new term in our day-to-day vocabulary. While society practiced physical distancing, the greater challenge is maintaining the social proximity we wrote about several months ago. In our ongoing work with corporate leaders, non-profit leaders and business owners, several key points from a 20-year-old paper still resonate.


How to Lead – We define leadership as setting goals and achieving desired results. Situational leadership theory tells us effective leaders adapt their leadership to the commitment and competence of their followers. Moving to a virtual or quasi-virtual environment changed the follower dynamic as they adjusted to the new reality of working away from the traditional office. Both their commitment and competence continue to flex, meaning leaders must also flex to be effective. Situational Leadership theory suggests four leadership styles to align to their followers: Directing, Coaching, Supporting and Delegating. How are you flexing your style to maintain leadership effectiveness?


How to Communicate – Effective Communication occurs when all parties understand the message in the same context. As effective communication is the biggest challenge in business on a good day, we have seen this challenge exponentially increase in the virtual world. Whatever leadership communications were comfortable in the traditional office are now challenged across the board. For example, emotions now play a greater role in understanding the message. Nonverbal communications and awareness play an increased role in understanding the message. Finally, communications are more deliberate and planned to be effective and fully understood. How are you adapting your communications to be understood?


How to Measure Results – An organization does well what the leader measures. This brings us to the end goal and the inspiration for the title quote by John Wooden, legendary UCLA Basketball Coach. Throughout my career as a leader and coach, I witnessed far too many leaders who perceived progress without the facts to support their perceptions. These leaders now struggle in a virtual world because their focus on activity versus results makes it more difficult to paint a realistic picture of progress. They rely on a weak measurement system that may have relied too heavily on MBWA (Management By Walking Around) and not enough on factual measures of progress. Those with strong measurement systems in place are merely flexing their existing data collection rather than creating new, at a time when real time information is needed the most. How is your measurement system validating the organizations desired results?


The pandemic challenged all facets of society to flex and adapt their organizations to operate in new ways. New ways to lead, new ways to communicate and new ways to measure progress. A key question we’ve asked all our clients centers on what new best practices they’ve identified and implemented based on the lessons learned from operating virtually. The new reality is here to stay. So too, should the adaptations needed to continue achieving desired results!


What are your new leadership best practices?


Lead Well!

Follow Us:

Our Latest Insights

By Rick Lochner • October 26, 2026
...by its resiliency in uncertainty”
How are you leveraging AI to differentiate your business?
By Rick Lochner • September 28, 2026
...so that you can do something about it now”
By Rick Lochner • August 26, 2026
...it’s the product of their interaction.” While we’ve written intermittently about systems and processes, the current VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Comple, Ambiguous) business environment compels us to spend more time on how important systems thinking is to effective leadership. We are using the title quote from the late Russell Ackoff , who was a pioneer in the field of operations research, systems thinking and management science. And to illustrate the importance of the title quote, we will use a case study we came across a year ago to drive the point home. The project was a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota named the New United Motor manufacturing, Inc. or NUMMI for short. The goal of the venture was to apply the lessons Toyota learned around lean manufacturing to a failing GM plant in Fremont, California. The results were dramatic in the increased productivity of the plant proving that transformation could occur with fundamentally the same personnel in the plant before and after the switch. While the application of lean methodologies succeeded in producing much improved results, the lessons learned were ultimately lost on GM leadership. They concluded that it was the processes alone that created the change since the personnel were basically the same. In fact, it was the interrelationships between the processes that carried the success of the venture overall. Today, that plant is owned by Tesla. So, what does that mean in a VUCA business environment? It means that leaders trying to react and flex to pieces and parts of the system that are impacted by change will struggle to solve the problem in a sustainable way. It is understanding that volatility and/or complexity, while deeply affecting one particular part of the system, ultimately has systemic impacts across other systems as well. It also means that uncertainty and/or ambiguity will make it difficult to ascertain where the solution lies without looking at the business through the lens of systems thinking. Now, just for the fun of it, let’s throw in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). The AI impact has come at the business environment with a vengeance to the point where we are already seeing the strategic and systemic challenges encountered by early adopters. In our estimation, it once again looks like business leaders are adopting AI as a workforce replacement instead of addressing where AI fits into the current and desired systems approach to the business. Once again, the absence of being able to see the interrelationships between systems creates major blind spots and lessons not learned similar to the NUMMI and GM venture. From our 2022 book, “ Finding the Missing Piece : The Impact of Effective Communications on sustainable Success”, we define systems thinking as, “...a holistic approach focusing on how a system’s components work together, how a system operates over time as well as how it operates in the context of other larger systems.” The only way systems can provide the foundational value to the organization is through leaders who can fully appreciate and understand its benefits, especially in a VUCA business environment! How are your leadership interactions enhancing the business systems? If you’re not sure, we can help . Lead Well!