“What we see…

August 26, 2015

Share this article:

Hand holding a coin-operated binocular viewer at sunset by the water

…depends mainly on what we look for.” It seems that everywhere we look in business writings these days, you will find multiple posts and articles on the importance of culture to business success. With all the expertise being distributed, you have to wonder why we haven’t figured it out by now! The truth lies in the definition of culture combined with the accelerated speed of change we now find ourselves in as 21st Century leaders.



A common definition I use with clients and my graduate students is where culture is the shared beliefs, values, attitudes, behaviors and norms that guide members of the organization. Based on this definition, we can conclude that culture exists in every organization large or small. While every organization has culture embedded in its DNA, the real question is whether the culture can support sustainable success through the vision and strategy of the business. How does a leader know if the culture is what she wants it to be?


  • Define the Culture – Too many leaders talk the talk of culture yet struggle to define their own business cultures. If we go back to the definition, a culture is defined by a set of attitudes and behaviors any outsider could see and describe. This is not as easy as it sounds, especially when describing the attitudes desired in the culture. If a leader tells me their culture is one of “Can-Do” then what does that look like?
  • Audit the Culture – Once defined, leaders periodically plug into the culture and see if it is what they believe it to be. The title quote of this article by John Lubbock speaks to leaders who can offer a litany of things done to create the desired culture without spending the requisite time validating their efforts. Culture is defined by what the organization’s members do, not by what the leader wants them to do!
  • Live the Culture – The most important action the leader can do is set the example of what the culture should be. Living the culture with integrity means the leaders themselves are living examples to the organization of the desired attitudes and behaviors expected by everyone in the business. It does little good to espouse the virtues of a family-oriented culture if leaders treat associates as expendable laborers whose only value is in the transactions they conduct. Their behavior will dictate culture and in this example of out-of-integrity, it will not look family-oriented!
  • Hire for Cultural Fit – The last piece of this discussion is hiring people who are a cultural fit to the organization. Once again, the definition of culture comes into play where new associates are predominantly hired for their attitudes and values. While skills and knowledge are important, combined they represent a quarter of the success of the new hire. Attitude represents the majority of the cultural fit and is what the leader must be looking for in the hiring process. Having used this successfully in my own career, I continue to see examples of success when attitude is the differentiator over skills and knowledge, even when the skills are less than what is initially desired.


I often use a graphic of an iceberg to depict culture. The behaviors are what we see above the water. We all know that most of the iceberg (over 90% of it) is underwater. So too is the rest of the culture we cannot see (values, attitudes, beliefs etc.) below the waterline. To define the true size of the iceberg, we look below the waterline. To accurately define the culture, leaders must look below the waterline and see the rest of what they are looking for.

What do you look for in your culture? What do others see in your culture?


Lead Well!

Follow Us:

Our Latest Insights

How are you leveraging AI to differentiate your business?
By Rick Lochner • September 28, 2026
...so that you can do something about it now”
By Rick Lochner • August 26, 2026
...it’s the product of their interaction.” While we’ve written intermittently about systems and processes, the current VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Comple, Ambiguous) business environment compels us to spend more time on how important systems thinking is to effective leadership. We are using the title quote from the late Russell Ackoff , who was a pioneer in the field of operations research, systems thinking and management science. And to illustrate the importance of the title quote, we will use a case study we came across a year ago to drive the point home. The project was a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota named the New United Motor manufacturing, Inc. or NUMMI for short. The goal of the venture was to apply the lessons Toyota learned around lean manufacturing to a failing GM plant in Fremont, California. The results were dramatic in the increased productivity of the plant proving that transformation could occur with fundamentally the same personnel in the plant before and after the switch. While the application of lean methodologies succeeded in producing much improved results, the lessons learned were ultimately lost on GM leadership. They concluded that it was the processes alone that created the change since the personnel were basically the same. In fact, it was the interrelationships between the processes that carried the success of the venture overall. Today, that plant is owned by Tesla. So, what does that mean in a VUCA business environment? It means that leaders trying to react and flex to pieces and parts of the system that are impacted by change will struggle to solve the problem in a sustainable way. It is understanding that volatility and/or complexity, while deeply affecting one particular part of the system, ultimately has systemic impacts across other systems as well. It also means that uncertainty and/or ambiguity will make it difficult to ascertain where the solution lies without looking at the business through the lens of systems thinking. Now, just for the fun of it, let’s throw in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). The AI impact has come at the business environment with a vengeance to the point where we are already seeing the strategic and systemic challenges encountered by early adopters. In our estimation, it once again looks like business leaders are adopting AI as a workforce replacement instead of addressing where AI fits into the current and desired systems approach to the business. Once again, the absence of being able to see the interrelationships between systems creates major blind spots and lessons not learned similar to the NUMMI and GM venture. From our 2022 book, “ Finding the Missing Piece : The Impact of Effective Communications on sustainable Success”, we define systems thinking as, “...a holistic approach focusing on how a system’s components work together, how a system operates over time as well as how it operates in the context of other larger systems.” The only way systems can provide the foundational value to the organization is through leaders who can fully appreciate and understand its benefits, especially in a VUCA business environment! How are your leadership interactions enhancing the business systems? If you’re not sure, we can help . Lead Well!
Green road signs labeled “LEADER” left and “FOLLOWER” right on a pole
By Rick Lochner • July 26, 2026
This is a question every leader of any business (for profit or non-profit) of any size and any industry or market needs to regularly ask themselves. It is a critical question in that it establishes the very reason a leader earns the privilege of being called a leader.