The Best Teacher…

November 25, 2019

Share this article:

…is Your Last Mistake



What is your attitude towards failure? We ask this question, or a variation of it, many times when coaching leaders at all levels of an organization. Interestingly enough, we get more absolute answers from front line managers and supervisors and more broadly defined answers from senior management. Said differently, our experience tells us we see less leeway for failure on the front lines to the point of wanting to be stressfully perfect to a different attitude towards failure where it is a means to learn and grow. I am not suggesting these experiences are scientifically representative, merely what our experiences are with the topic. The question is, why the difference at all?


It’s amazing how frequently we hear about the lessons we learned from our mistakes along the pathway of life. Learning how to walk, riding a bike, driving a car and all the other things that people learn from doing, making mistakes and doing it again until it was a habit. Yet when it comes to work and the complexities and challenges that come with achieving desired results, those lessons are forgotten and the strive for perfection becomes the norm.


The leadership challenge is clear. How does the culture or the organization, which leaders are directly responsible for creating and maintaining, treat mistakes or failures? How do the leaders react when they hear of a mistake or failure within their organization? One of my standard practices as an executive when I heard of a mistake was threefold.


  • Fix the problem ~ When mistakes are made, the first action is always to fix the problem. Trying to blame someone or something when the problem still exists serves no purpose other than to confuse an already confusing situation. Quite often, if the mistake impacts a client, the client may go down this path right away and it is the leader’s responsibility to direct the initial efforts and focus to fixing the problem!
  • What happened ~ Here is where my personal philosophy differed from many others. The first person I spoke with was not the person that made the mistake. The first person I spoke with was the manager of the person who made the mistake. My assumption was always that the person who made the mistake did come to work that day to make the mistake. What was incomplete that caused the mistake?
  • What was learned ~ Obviously, the person who made the mistake will need to understand what they did wrong and how they will work with their manager to make different decisions the next time the situation arises, which it will. Closing the loop with an active discussion of what new decisions will be made the next time ensures all concerned have a new mental image of better decisions without feeling like their career is over!


In his 2011 TED Talk, General Stanley McKrystal said, “Leaders can let you fail and yet not let you be a failure.” Mistakes are a part of the process and yet failure is really only an issue if nothing was learned from the mistake. The only failure is not learning from our mistakes, everything else is the best teacher we can have!


How do your leadership attitudes and behaviors help your team learn from their mistakes?


Lead Well!

Follow Us:

Our Latest Insights

By Rick Lochner • October 26, 2026
...by its resiliency in uncertainty”
How are you leveraging AI to differentiate your business?
By Rick Lochner • September 28, 2026
...so that you can do something about it now”
By Rick Lochner • August 26, 2026
...it’s the product of their interaction.” While we’ve written intermittently about systems and processes, the current VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Comple, Ambiguous) business environment compels us to spend more time on how important systems thinking is to effective leadership. We are using the title quote from the late Russell Ackoff , who was a pioneer in the field of operations research, systems thinking and management science. And to illustrate the importance of the title quote, we will use a case study we came across a year ago to drive the point home. The project was a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota named the New United Motor manufacturing, Inc. or NUMMI for short. The goal of the venture was to apply the lessons Toyota learned around lean manufacturing to a failing GM plant in Fremont, California. The results were dramatic in the increased productivity of the plant proving that transformation could occur with fundamentally the same personnel in the plant before and after the switch. While the application of lean methodologies succeeded in producing much improved results, the lessons learned were ultimately lost on GM leadership. They concluded that it was the processes alone that created the change since the personnel were basically the same. In fact, it was the interrelationships between the processes that carried the success of the venture overall. Today, that plant is owned by Tesla. So, what does that mean in a VUCA business environment? It means that leaders trying to react and flex to pieces and parts of the system that are impacted by change will struggle to solve the problem in a sustainable way. It is understanding that volatility and/or complexity, while deeply affecting one particular part of the system, ultimately has systemic impacts across other systems as well. It also means that uncertainty and/or ambiguity will make it difficult to ascertain where the solution lies without looking at the business through the lens of systems thinking. Now, just for the fun of it, let’s throw in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). The AI impact has come at the business environment with a vengeance to the point where we are already seeing the strategic and systemic challenges encountered by early adopters. In our estimation, it once again looks like business leaders are adopting AI as a workforce replacement instead of addressing where AI fits into the current and desired systems approach to the business. Once again, the absence of being able to see the interrelationships between systems creates major blind spots and lessons not learned similar to the NUMMI and GM venture. From our 2022 book, “ Finding the Missing Piece : The Impact of Effective Communications on sustainable Success”, we define systems thinking as, “...a holistic approach focusing on how a system’s components work together, how a system operates over time as well as how it operates in the context of other larger systems.” The only way systems can provide the foundational value to the organization is through leaders who can fully appreciate and understand its benefits, especially in a VUCA business environment! How are your leadership interactions enhancing the business systems? If you’re not sure, we can help . Lead Well!