"The absence of conflict…

February 25, 2018

Share this article:

This is a subtitle for your new post

Scrabble tiles spelling “TRUST” among scattered letter tiles on a wooden surface

…does not equal the presence of trust.”
Just over five years ago, I wrote these words in a
blog detailing the important elements of trust. They recently came back to me as the topic surfaced as a key element of so many coaching conversations over the last several months. There was a leader struggling to verbalize the diminished trust they had with a key associate. Or the leadership team concerned that a public proclamation of trust as a value would somehow have a negative effect (images of the sleazy salesperson who leads with “trust me” accompanied by a sly grin!) These, and other similar conversations, have me wondering why something so obviously key to effective leadership would be so difficult to verbalize. Upon reflection, I found the conversation broke down to two primary categories of trust; Ethics and Compliance, both of which we’ll explore a little deeper.


  • Trust based on Ethics – Trust based on ethics suggests leaders and followers trust each other to do the right things at the right times simply because they believe it is right! It stems from the beliefs, attitudes and norms that motivate members of the organization to do what is right whether or not anyone is directly seeing the action or directly managing the process. I often refer to this environment as playing to win beyond simply getting things done, but also done the right way!
  • Trust based on Compliance – Trust based on compliance suggests leaders and followers trust each other to do the right things at the right times because those are the rules! It stems from rules and legal procedures that motivate members of the organization based on an element of fear and the need to avoid negative consequences of breaking the rules. I refer to this environment as one of playing not to lose as the focus is less about advancing the organization as it is about survival of the individual leader or follower.


Whether leaders and followers trust based on ethics or compliance, the underlying foundation for both is the organization’s culture. As we define culture as the combined beliefs, attitudes, behaviors and norms that guide the actions of the people in the organization, we can easily see the importance between it and trust. Does trust come natural based on a culture that engenders authentic collaboration between leaders and followers? Or is trust forced and guarded based on a culture that focuses on rule-following and blame between leaders and followers?


Going back to the title, just because there is no conflict does not mean that trust exists between leaders and followers. In fact, a sound argument can be made that the presence of conflict is, in and by itself, a sign that leaders and followers trust each other well enough to disagree in pursuit of the best decisions for the organization!


What is the trust in your organization based on and how do you know?


Lead Well!

Follow Us:

Our Latest Insights

How are you leveraging AI to differentiate your business?
By Rick Lochner • September 28, 2026
...so that you can do something about it now”
By Rick Lochner • August 26, 2026
...it’s the product of their interaction.” While we’ve written intermittently about systems and processes, the current VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Comple, Ambiguous) business environment compels us to spend more time on how important systems thinking is to effective leadership. We are using the title quote from the late Russell Ackoff , who was a pioneer in the field of operations research, systems thinking and management science. And to illustrate the importance of the title quote, we will use a case study we came across a year ago to drive the point home. The project was a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota named the New United Motor manufacturing, Inc. or NUMMI for short. The goal of the venture was to apply the lessons Toyota learned around lean manufacturing to a failing GM plant in Fremont, California. The results were dramatic in the increased productivity of the plant proving that transformation could occur with fundamentally the same personnel in the plant before and after the switch. While the application of lean methodologies succeeded in producing much improved results, the lessons learned were ultimately lost on GM leadership. They concluded that it was the processes alone that created the change since the personnel were basically the same. In fact, it was the interrelationships between the processes that carried the success of the venture overall. Today, that plant is owned by Tesla. So, what does that mean in a VUCA business environment? It means that leaders trying to react and flex to pieces and parts of the system that are impacted by change will struggle to solve the problem in a sustainable way. It is understanding that volatility and/or complexity, while deeply affecting one particular part of the system, ultimately has systemic impacts across other systems as well. It also means that uncertainty and/or ambiguity will make it difficult to ascertain where the solution lies without looking at the business through the lens of systems thinking. Now, just for the fun of it, let’s throw in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). The AI impact has come at the business environment with a vengeance to the point where we are already seeing the strategic and systemic challenges encountered by early adopters. In our estimation, it once again looks like business leaders are adopting AI as a workforce replacement instead of addressing where AI fits into the current and desired systems approach to the business. Once again, the absence of being able to see the interrelationships between systems creates major blind spots and lessons not learned similar to the NUMMI and GM venture. From our 2022 book, “ Finding the Missing Piece : The Impact of Effective Communications on sustainable Success”, we define systems thinking as, “...a holistic approach focusing on how a system’s components work together, how a system operates over time as well as how it operates in the context of other larger systems.” The only way systems can provide the foundational value to the organization is through leaders who can fully appreciate and understand its benefits, especially in a VUCA business environment! How are your leadership interactions enhancing the business systems? If you’re not sure, we can help . Lead Well!
Green road signs labeled “LEADER” left and “FOLLOWER” right on a pole
By Rick Lochner • July 26, 2026
This is a question every leader of any business (for profit or non-profit) of any size and any industry or market needs to regularly ask themselves. It is a critical question in that it establishes the very reason a leader earns the privilege of being called a leader.