What’s in it for me?

June 25, 2024

Share this article:

Last month, we wrote about the impact of consequences and their importance in seeing visible change in skills, behaviors and attitudes. Without them, it is just too easy for leaders and followers alike to fall back into old habits. In this edition, and in response to conversations around change we’ve had with our own leadership and business coaching clients, we will focus on a structure we used both as leader and coach to effectively communicate change.


It stands to reason that as a business strategy evolves, so too do the needs of the business for and from its people. As leaders communicate the new strategy to the organization, how are they also communicating the changes in skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary to effectively execute the new strategy? How are they winning over hearts and minds to help embrace change at an emotional level?

The format we recommend and follow consists of the five elements listed below and first introduced by Achilles A Asmerakis and Stanley G. Harris in 2002:


  1. Discrepancy ~ help the organization understand the need for change; why the current state of the business is not acceptable and what would happen if no change occurred. This is where consequences have a role to play in helping the organization understand what happens if nothing changes. The leader’s communications must connect with the organization on both a physical and an emotional level.
  2. Efficacy ~ instilling confidence in the organization that they have the ability and skills needed to succeed in the proposed change. This includes communicating both the technical skills required for each function as well as the people skills required to leverage the new technical skills. We are seeing this play out in a very meaningful way as artificial intelligence invades every corner of the business consciousness.
  3. Appropriateness ~ convincing the organization of the appropriateness of the change to win their minds and hearts, normal resistance notwithstanding. Effective leaders are rarely surprised by some level of resistance to change. Resistance to change is a normal human condition so leaders must embrace it and communicate in a way that resonates on a human level and addresses the specific reasons why the resistance to the change exists.
  4. Principal Support ~ demonstrate to the organization the requisite resources and commitment are in place to see the change through to institutionalization. The challenge of change is easier to accept when leadership provides and communicates the means to succeed as an organization. We see this in organizations that minimize the chaos of change by investing in retraining existing employees rather than firing those with less relevant skills and hiring all new employees with newer skills.
  5. Personal Valence ~ help the organization understand how the change impacts them personally and how they fit into the new scheme of the business, including their roles in the transition. Everyone listens to WIIFM (What’s In It For Me) Radio so leaders must proactively and openly communicate what can be shared as to the impact of the change. A key element of success here is to treat this as a series of conversations versus a one-time event.


The last bullet point brings up a challenge many leaders struggle with when communicating change. “What if I don't know the answer to their questions?”, they ask. Our answer is always the same. Tell them what you can and if you do not know the answer or cannot tell them because of confidentiality, then tell them that as well. Our experience tells us that the more up front the organization knows what to expect as far as the skills, knowledge, and attitudes they will need in the new reality, the more they will ultimately embrace the change itself. Springing it on people at the last minute where they have little time to react and process the new information only creates more problems than it solves!


How well are you communicating changes to your team and how do you know? If you are not sure, we can help!


Lead Well!

Follow Us:

Our Latest Insights

How are you leveraging AI to differentiate your business?
By Rick Lochner • September 28, 2026
...so that you can do something about it now”
By Rick Lochner • August 26, 2026
...it’s the product of their interaction.” While we’ve written intermittently about systems and processes, the current VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Comple, Ambiguous) business environment compels us to spend more time on how important systems thinking is to effective leadership. We are using the title quote from the late Russell Ackoff , who was a pioneer in the field of operations research, systems thinking and management science. And to illustrate the importance of the title quote, we will use a case study we came across a year ago to drive the point home. The project was a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota named the New United Motor manufacturing, Inc. or NUMMI for short. The goal of the venture was to apply the lessons Toyota learned around lean manufacturing to a failing GM plant in Fremont, California. The results were dramatic in the increased productivity of the plant proving that transformation could occur with fundamentally the same personnel in the plant before and after the switch. While the application of lean methodologies succeeded in producing much improved results, the lessons learned were ultimately lost on GM leadership. They concluded that it was the processes alone that created the change since the personnel were basically the same. In fact, it was the interrelationships between the processes that carried the success of the venture overall. Today, that plant is owned by Tesla. So, what does that mean in a VUCA business environment? It means that leaders trying to react and flex to pieces and parts of the system that are impacted by change will struggle to solve the problem in a sustainable way. It is understanding that volatility and/or complexity, while deeply affecting one particular part of the system, ultimately has systemic impacts across other systems as well. It also means that uncertainty and/or ambiguity will make it difficult to ascertain where the solution lies without looking at the business through the lens of systems thinking. Now, just for the fun of it, let’s throw in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). The AI impact has come at the business environment with a vengeance to the point where we are already seeing the strategic and systemic challenges encountered by early adopters. In our estimation, it once again looks like business leaders are adopting AI as a workforce replacement instead of addressing where AI fits into the current and desired systems approach to the business. Once again, the absence of being able to see the interrelationships between systems creates major blind spots and lessons not learned similar to the NUMMI and GM venture. From our 2022 book, “ Finding the Missing Piece : The Impact of Effective Communications on sustainable Success”, we define systems thinking as, “...a holistic approach focusing on how a system’s components work together, how a system operates over time as well as how it operates in the context of other larger systems.” The only way systems can provide the foundational value to the organization is through leaders who can fully appreciate and understand its benefits, especially in a VUCA business environment! How are your leadership interactions enhancing the business systems? If you’re not sure, we can help . Lead Well!
Green road signs labeled “LEADER” left and “FOLLOWER” right on a pole
By Rick Lochner • July 26, 2026
This is a question every leader of any business (for profit or non-profit) of any size and any industry or market needs to regularly ask themselves. It is a critical question in that it establishes the very reason a leader earns the privilege of being called a leader.