Step Up...

May 25, 2025

Share this article:

...or Step Aside



It is a well-known fact that leadership is a team sport in that without followership, there is no leadership. When we look at the characteristics that define a team: complementary skills, common purpose and mutual accountability, we find one of these to be easily understood yet the most difficult to execute well. As teamwork requires all three to exist to be effective, we’ll dig deeper into the challenges of mutual accountability!

In our mind, there is nothing worse for teamwork than looking around the table at a team where individually everyone emphatically states they did the job they were responsible for, yet the desired outcomes were not achieved. It is a classic case of a team only holding themselves responsible to their assigned tasks. It can be through a job description, a project plan, a workflow, or any other number of ways that team tasks are delineated.


What is clearly missing is the team’s accountability to each other as a team and to the team’s success. We also recognize how accountability has been unfairly misused as a stick to criticize individuals on teams for the lack of success. What leaders who use this negative tactic don’t understand is that accountability is more of an attitude than a task to be completed.

For example, we challenge leaders to look at a sampling of job descriptions in their organization and report how many times any version of the word “accountable” appears. After seventeen plus years in our leadership and business coaching practice, we are still looking for an organization that passes this simple query, although admittedly some have come close. Yet, the same leaders will not hesitate to hold accountability over their team members without truly understanding what it means. For us, there are two key elements that support a bigger level of mutual accountability on a team, ownership, and trust.


Ownership simply means the team “own” their thoughts and actions. There are no excuses for miscues or misses that affect the team’s mission and desired results. Surely, mistakes and miscues occur on teams, especially in today’s VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, Ambiguous) business environment. Team members’ ownership of both the error and the corrections leads to a buildup of the other key element of mutual accountability ~ trust.


We’ve written numerous articles regarding the value of trust in leadership and leading teams. One of the elements of the trust equation forwarded by Trusted Advisor Associates, LLC is the idea of self-orientation. Essentially, high self-orientation means the team member is more concerned about their own interests above those of the team. Conversely, how self-orientation means the team member puts the team’s interest above their own. This level of benevolence is crucial to building the level of trust that creates mutual accountability in an organic way!

Fans of the Star Trek movies will appreciate the words of Spock in The Wrath of Khan when he said, “...the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” Mutual accountability dictates the needs of the team outweigh the needs of any one team member built on a high level of ownership and trust!


How are you stepping up to lead your team? If you are not sure, we can help!


Lead Well!

Follow Us:

Our Latest Insights

How are you leveraging AI to differentiate your business?
By Rick Lochner • September 28, 2026
...so that you can do something about it now”
By Rick Lochner • August 26, 2026
...it’s the product of their interaction.” While we’ve written intermittently about systems and processes, the current VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Comple, Ambiguous) business environment compels us to spend more time on how important systems thinking is to effective leadership. We are using the title quote from the late Russell Ackoff , who was a pioneer in the field of operations research, systems thinking and management science. And to illustrate the importance of the title quote, we will use a case study we came across a year ago to drive the point home. The project was a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota named the New United Motor manufacturing, Inc. or NUMMI for short. The goal of the venture was to apply the lessons Toyota learned around lean manufacturing to a failing GM plant in Fremont, California. The results were dramatic in the increased productivity of the plant proving that transformation could occur with fundamentally the same personnel in the plant before and after the switch. While the application of lean methodologies succeeded in producing much improved results, the lessons learned were ultimately lost on GM leadership. They concluded that it was the processes alone that created the change since the personnel were basically the same. In fact, it was the interrelationships between the processes that carried the success of the venture overall. Today, that plant is owned by Tesla. So, what does that mean in a VUCA business environment? It means that leaders trying to react and flex to pieces and parts of the system that are impacted by change will struggle to solve the problem in a sustainable way. It is understanding that volatility and/or complexity, while deeply affecting one particular part of the system, ultimately has systemic impacts across other systems as well. It also means that uncertainty and/or ambiguity will make it difficult to ascertain where the solution lies without looking at the business through the lens of systems thinking. Now, just for the fun of it, let’s throw in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). The AI impact has come at the business environment with a vengeance to the point where we are already seeing the strategic and systemic challenges encountered by early adopters. In our estimation, it once again looks like business leaders are adopting AI as a workforce replacement instead of addressing where AI fits into the current and desired systems approach to the business. Once again, the absence of being able to see the interrelationships between systems creates major blind spots and lessons not learned similar to the NUMMI and GM venture. From our 2022 book, “ Finding the Missing Piece : The Impact of Effective Communications on sustainable Success”, we define systems thinking as, “...a holistic approach focusing on how a system’s components work together, how a system operates over time as well as how it operates in the context of other larger systems.” The only way systems can provide the foundational value to the organization is through leaders who can fully appreciate and understand its benefits, especially in a VUCA business environment! How are your leadership interactions enhancing the business systems? If you’re not sure, we can help . Lead Well!
Green road signs labeled “LEADER” left and “FOLLOWER” right on a pole
By Rick Lochner • July 26, 2026
This is a question every leader of any business (for profit or non-profit) of any size and any industry or market needs to regularly ask themselves. It is a critical question in that it establishes the very reason a leader earns the privilege of being called a leader.