Perfectionism is a competition with yourself...

August 26, 2024

Share this article:

...that you can never win.


Several times over the last nine years, we asked the leadership question, “Are you trying to be perfect or excellent?” In our discussions both here and here, we spoke in general terms of the difference between perfectionist leadership and imperfect excellence leadership. In our leadership and business coaching practice, we continue to see leaders struggle with perfectionist attitudes. In this discussion, we will focus more directly on the marked differences between the two mindsets and the impact they have on effectively leading teams.

Our discussion here will focus on three key areas of team leadership: leading change, team development and team culture/climate. In today’s new reality, these three areas are crucial to successful execution as they align with the three criteria needed to define a true team: common purpose, complimentary skills and collective accountability, respectively.



So, let’s explore each in more detail:


  • Leading Change ~ one of the greatest challenges for any team is staying aligned to their common purpose in the face of constant change. A perfectionist leader tends to overthink issues and view mistakes as failure, thereby creating a climate of risk aversion on their team. Innovation comes from being able to think creatively which rarely occurs under the jaundiced eye of a perfectionist. A leader who embodies imperfect excellence encourages progress over perfection and is therefore more comfortable with embracing change. These leaders view mistakes as learning opportunities to best achieve the team’s common purpose!


  • Team Development ~ achieving the right mix of complementary skills on a team requires ongoing development of those skills to ensure relevancy in today’s new reality. The perfectionist leader is prone to micromanage their team and struggle to delegate appropriately out of fear of mistakes. By only focusing on the end goal versus also focusing on the process of achieving the end goal, the team becomes stifled in their collective development. The imperfectly excellent leader, however, embraces the learning process from all angles knowing the team becomes stronger with each learning opportunity. These leaders are comfortable providing a level of team autonomy to allow for the interactive learning process to continuously develop the most relevant complimentary skills!


  • Team Culture/Climate ~ arguably the most important element of what separates high performing teams from all the rest is how well they hold each other accountable. Because the perfectionist leader has unrealistic expectations of themselves and their team, team morale and trust are compromised in the risk-averse team culture and climate. Without trust, collective accountability simply cannot exist. The imperfectly excellent leader, on the other hand, is comfortable with empowerment and providing ongoing recognition of incremental progress towards their common purpose. This breeds a culture and climate of confidence and trust in each other leading to a higher level of collective accountability by every member of the team!


The idea that a leader has to be a perfectionist to have high standards is nothing but a myth. Leaders with high standards of excellence understand the concept of winning in their markets and industries is an iterative and adaptable learning process. Leaders who adopt this mindset can effectively lead their teams through the challenges of the new reality while creating a culture and climate that develops relevant skills for sustainable success.


How well are you setting your team up to win? If you are not sure, we can help!


Lead Well!

Follow Us:

Our Latest Insights

How are you leveraging AI to differentiate your business?
By Rick Lochner • September 28, 2026
...so that you can do something about it now”
By Rick Lochner • August 26, 2026
...it’s the product of their interaction.” While we’ve written intermittently about systems and processes, the current VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Comple, Ambiguous) business environment compels us to spend more time on how important systems thinking is to effective leadership. We are using the title quote from the late Russell Ackoff , who was a pioneer in the field of operations research, systems thinking and management science. And to illustrate the importance of the title quote, we will use a case study we came across a year ago to drive the point home. The project was a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota named the New United Motor manufacturing, Inc. or NUMMI for short. The goal of the venture was to apply the lessons Toyota learned around lean manufacturing to a failing GM plant in Fremont, California. The results were dramatic in the increased productivity of the plant proving that transformation could occur with fundamentally the same personnel in the plant before and after the switch. While the application of lean methodologies succeeded in producing much improved results, the lessons learned were ultimately lost on GM leadership. They concluded that it was the processes alone that created the change since the personnel were basically the same. In fact, it was the interrelationships between the processes that carried the success of the venture overall. Today, that plant is owned by Tesla. So, what does that mean in a VUCA business environment? It means that leaders trying to react and flex to pieces and parts of the system that are impacted by change will struggle to solve the problem in a sustainable way. It is understanding that volatility and/or complexity, while deeply affecting one particular part of the system, ultimately has systemic impacts across other systems as well. It also means that uncertainty and/or ambiguity will make it difficult to ascertain where the solution lies without looking at the business through the lens of systems thinking. Now, just for the fun of it, let’s throw in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). The AI impact has come at the business environment with a vengeance to the point where we are already seeing the strategic and systemic challenges encountered by early adopters. In our estimation, it once again looks like business leaders are adopting AI as a workforce replacement instead of addressing where AI fits into the current and desired systems approach to the business. Once again, the absence of being able to see the interrelationships between systems creates major blind spots and lessons not learned similar to the NUMMI and GM venture. From our 2022 book, “ Finding the Missing Piece : The Impact of Effective Communications on sustainable Success”, we define systems thinking as, “...a holistic approach focusing on how a system’s components work together, how a system operates over time as well as how it operates in the context of other larger systems.” The only way systems can provide the foundational value to the organization is through leaders who can fully appreciate and understand its benefits, especially in a VUCA business environment! How are your leadership interactions enhancing the business systems? If you’re not sure, we can help . Lead Well!
Green road signs labeled “LEADER” left and “FOLLOWER” right on a pole
By Rick Lochner • July 26, 2026
This is a question every leader of any business (for profit or non-profit) of any size and any industry or market needs to regularly ask themselves. It is a critical question in that it establishes the very reason a leader earns the privilege of being called a leader.